Skip to content

stevegrossi

Degrowth

Tended 1 month ago (7 times) Planted 2 years ago Mentioned 6 times

Contents

As the Limits to Growth report made clear in 1972, the Earth simply cannot support the limitless growth and resource consumption upon which the present economic order depends. Degrowth is a movement and theory emphasizing the need for transition to a sustainable, equitable economy and society that does not depend on the impossibility of infinite growth. It is closely related to anti-consumerism, and an essential strategy to reducing the impact of climate change.

A counter-argument to degrowth is the idea that we can “decouple” present levels of economic growth from environmental degradation (this is sometimes called “green growth”). The European Environmental Bureau has a paper Decoupling Debunked which presents evidence that “decoupling on its own, i.e. without addressing the issue of economic growth, has not been and will not be sufficient to reduce environmental pressures to the required extent” while acknowledging that greener growth can still be useful in the short term and should not be opposed because “without many such measures the situation would be far worse”. The tension between “decoupling” and “degrowth” reminds me of Shifting the Burden, a system trap. Even though decoupling can help, is it a short-term “intervenor” we might grow dependent on instead of addressing the root cause, which is the incompatibility between infinite growth and limited environmental resources?

Degrowth does not have to mean a lower quality of life

Rebecca Solnit:

What if we imagined “wealth” consisting not of the money we stuff into banks or the fossil fuel-derived goods we pile up, but of joy, beauty, friendship, community, closeness to flourishing nature, to good food produced without abuse of labor? What if we were to think of wealth as security in our environments and societies, and as confidence in a viable future?

“Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers,” William Wordsworth wrote a couple of centuries ago. What would it mean to recover those powers, to be rich in time instead of stuff?

For so many of us, being busy with work has leached away our capacity to pursue true riches. What if we were to prioritize reclaiming our time — to fret less about getting and spending — and instead “spend” this precious resource on creative pursuits, on adventure and learning, on building stronger societies and being better citizens, on caring for the people (and other species and places) we love, on taking care of ourselves?

Further Reading

Mentions

  • wealth

    …available to continue improving our quality-of-life while also [[Degrowth|reducing the resources our society consumes]] in order to [[Limits…

  • frugal hedonism

    …your consumption. Without using the term, it essentially advocates for [[Degrowth]] at the personal level: slow down, [[waste]] less, and get…

  • energy descent

    …t last forever. [[Limits to Growth]] foresaw this, and the [[Degrowth]] movement argues that we should make energy descent slightly less…

  • waste

    …in the first place 2. For what can't be avoided, **[[Degrowth|Consume as little as possible]]** 3. If we don't need…

  • Manufactured time scarcity

    …work-week can help us move in the direction of [[Degrowth]]. > If you're going to fight climate change, a decent…

  • voluntary simplicity

    …An approach to [[Degrowth]] at the individual level where people choose to reduce their…